<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adam Howell dot org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamhowell.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamhowell.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Wifi brings in the&#160;suits</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/06/24/wifi-brings-in-the-suits/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/06/24/wifi-brings-in-the-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[free wifi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[panera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wherever there&#8217;s free wi-fi and coffee, there will be binders full of shady sales pitches, suits and ties having day-long meetings to brainstorm out of the box solutions to hitting this quarter&#8217;s sales goals and earnest people doing their best to ignore the Kenny G and make that one last, loud, annoying sales call.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wherever there&#8217;s free wi-fi and coffee, there will be binders full of shady sales pitches, suits and ties having day-long meetings to brainstorm out of the box solutions to hitting this quarter&#8217;s sales goals and earnest people doing their best to ignore the Kenny G and make that one last, loud, annoying sales call.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/06/24/wifi-brings-in-the-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trivial notes about NFL&#160;logos</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/06/01/trivial-notes-about-nfl-logos/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/06/01/trivial-notes-about-nfl-logos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[logos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going through all the NFL logos on SportsLogos.net for a personal project of mine and came up with a few observations during my work:


Oldest logo still in use: Steelers (1963) &#8212; Dallas is a close second (64)
Coolest old logo: Chargers (61-73)
Stupidest old logo: Steelers (60-61) &#8212; slipping on a high steel beam shouldn&#8217;t be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going through all the NFL logos on <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net">SportsLogos.net</a> for a personal project of mine and came up with a few observations during my work:</p>

<ul>
<li>Oldest logo still in use: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=970">Steelers</a> (1963) &#8212; Dallas is a <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=406">close second</a> (64)</li>
<li>Coolest old logo: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=979">Chargers</a> (61-73)</li>
<li>Stupidest old logo: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=yg3ajf7lt77h2agajh81">Steelers</a> (60-61) &#8212; slipping on a high steel beam shouldn&#8217;t be this fun</li>
<li>Ugliest old logo: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=kfe50beil9jo3xf2nee7">Packers</a> (51-55) &#8212; <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=uhye4wpig2d7ul8sebe2">the redesign</a> wasn&#8217;t much better</li>
<li>Ugliest &#8220;team of the past&#8221; logo: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=ojbtoggcku8s3iq2mh9e">Houston Oilers</a> (60-71)</li>
<li>Most inclusive logo: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=2aqyixgohws3xwl7zir9">Chiefs</a> (63-71) &#8212; they included half the lower 48 in this thing</li>
<li>Logo that looks most like Radioshack&#8217;s current logo: <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/logo.php?id=qqsnye7igxo8ec46p6i8">Redskins</a> (70-71)</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/06/01/trivial-notes-about-nfl-logos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design blogging ain&#8217;t what it used to&#160;be</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/27/design-blogging-aint-what-it-used-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/27/design-blogging-aint-what-it-used-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a lot fewer design blogs than I used to, and one of the big reasons &#8212; even bigger than lack of time &#8212; is because there&#8217;s a lot less good content out there that needs to be kept up with. Designers just aren&#8217;t blogging like they used to.

Why? My guesses are 1) social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a lot fewer design blogs than I used to, and one of the big reasons &#8212; even bigger than lack of time &#8212; is because there&#8217;s a lot less good content out there that needs to be kept up with. Designers just aren&#8217;t blogging like they used to.</p>

<p>Why? My guesses are 1) social networks like Twitter and Facebook and 2) web design <a href="http://adamhowell.org/2008/02/18/the-stagnation-of-web-design/">has stalled</a> and it&#8217;s just not as much fun to write about as it was 3-4 years ago (there&#8217;s also probably a 3) of blogging in general isn&#8217;t as close knit or rewarding as it was a few years ago, which I&#8217;m sure is another big reason Twitter has taken off).</p>

<p>To test this theory I came up with 10 design bloggers who&#8217;ve been blogging since 2004 &#8212; when web standards adoption really took off and everyone was writing about it, sharing tips, tricks and their latest work. I wanted to compare the number of blog posts they&#8217;d written up to this point in 2004 to the number of blog posts they&#8217;ve written so far this year.</p>

<p>I know this isn&#8217;t a scientific study or anything, but here&#8217;s my quick count:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://andybudd.com">Andy Budd</a>, 2004: <strong>80</strong>, 2008: <strong>16</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://superfluousbanter.org">Dan Rubin</a>, 2004: <strong>24</strong>, 2008: <strong>3</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://meyerweb.com">Eric Meyer</a>, 2004: <strong>89</strong>, 2008: <strong>33</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com">Jason Santa Maria</a>, 2004: <strong>30</strong>, 2008: <strong>6</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://dkeithrobinson.com">Keith Robinson</a>, 2004: <strong>137</strong>, 2008: <strong>8</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://mezzoblue.com">Mezzoblue</a>, 2004: <strong>67</strong>, 2008: <strong>8</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://molly.com">Molly</a>, 2004: <strong>71</strong>, 2008: <strong>42</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://simplebits.com">Simplebits</a>, 2004: <strong>56</strong>, 2008: <strong>14</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://stopdesign.com">Stopdesign</a>, 2004: <strong>30</strong>, 2008: <strong>4</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://veerle.duoh.com">Veerle&#8217;s blog</a>,  2004: <strong>113</strong>, 2008: <strong>28</strong></li>
</ul>

<p>So, on average these still popular design bloggers have written about <strong>75% less this year than they did in 2004</strong>. I guess it speaks again to <a href="http://adamhowell.org/2008/01/22/zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz/">just how interesting web design&#8217;s gotten</a> these last few years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/27/design-blogging-aint-what-it-used-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sites launches to the&#160;world</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/22/google-sites-launches-to-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/22/google-sites-launches-to-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google sites]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night we expanded the launch of Google Sites to, well, everybody. Here&#8217;s the Techmeme and Blog Search coverage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night we expanded the launch of <a href="http://sites.google.com/">Google Sites</a> to, well, everybody. Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080522/p10#a080522p10">Techmeme</a> and <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;q=%22google+sites%22&amp;btnG=Search+Blogs">Blog Search</a> coverage.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/22/google-sites-launches-to-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solo no&#160;mo&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/12/solo-no-mo/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/12/solo-no-mo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[impossible]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m now finally, utterly, painfully convinced &#8212; after trying for years and years &#8212; that going solo with a side project that&#8217;ll eventually make enough money that you can quit your dayjob &#8212; while doing said dayjob fulltime &#8212; is virtually impossible. And very, very close to flat-out impossible.

Times two if you have anyone who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now finally, utterly, painfully convinced &#8212; after trying for years and years &#8212; that going solo with a side project that&#8217;ll eventually make enough money that you can quit your dayjob &#8212; while doing said dayjob fulltime &#8212; is virtually impossible. And very, very close to flat-out impossible.</p>

<p>Times two if you have anyone who cares about you and relies on you &#8212; and would like you to speak to them at least once a day &#8212; like say a wife or a toddler.</p>

<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just not smart enough. Or maybe my dayjob is just too demanding. Or maybe, just maybe, you really do have to go into a new business venture with your entire self &#8212; and the entire selves of a few others &#8212; in order to make it a success.</p>

<p>You win this one <a href="http://paulgraham.com/">PG</a>. Well played, sir.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/05/12/solo-no-mo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing with Google App Engine, Part&#160;I</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/22/developing-with-google-app-engine-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/22/developing-with-google-app-engine-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google app engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Developing with Google App Engine, Part I &#8212; the first of two articles I&#8217;m writing for Vitamin about GAE &#8212; is up. It touches on the basics of GAE through the building of the super simple Startupdown, &#8220;where startups throw down.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/webapps/developing-with-google-app-engine-part-i">Developing with Google App Engine, Part I</a> &#8212; the first of two articles I&#8217;m writing for Vitamin about GAE &#8212; is up. It touches on the basics of GAE through the building of the super simple <a href="http://startupdown.appspot.com/">Startupdown</a>, &#8220;where startups throw down.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/22/developing-with-google-app-engine-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Berry Remembers Call From Cousin About White Kid Playing &#8216;Johnny B.&#160;Goode&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/21/chuck-berry-remembers-call-from-cousin-about-white-kid-playing-johnny-b-goode/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/21/chuck-berry-remembers-call-from-cousin-about-white-kid-playing-johnny-b-goode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[back to the future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[highlarity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuck Berry Remembers Call From Cousin About White Kid Playing &#8216;Johnny B. Goode&#8217;. The Onion 1, Rest of Mankind 0.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/chuck_berry_remembers_call">Chuck Berry Remembers Call From Cousin About White Kid Playing &#8216;Johnny B. Goode&#8217;</a>. The Onion 1, Rest of Mankind 0.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/21/chuck-berry-remembers-call-from-cousin-about-white-kid-playing-johnny-b-goode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I want my Fireworks&#160;CS3</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/20/i-want-my-fireworks-cs3/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/20/i-want-my-fireworks-cs3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fireworks cs3]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought Fireworks CS3 last night. I&#8217;m still waiting for my activation email. Seriously? What, are they hand processing these things?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought Fireworks CS3 last night. I&#8217;m still waiting for my activation email. Seriously? What, are they hand processing these things?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/20/i-want-my-fireworks-cs3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FaxIt&#160;Nice</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/19/faxit-nice/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/19/faxit-nice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faxitnice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found something like FaxIt Nice once a long time ago and could never find it again. Finally, don&#8217;t have to pay monthly or go to Kinko&#8217;s for my once or twice a month fax needs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found something like <a href="http://www.faxitnice.com/">FaxIt Nice</a> once a long time ago and could never find it again. Finally, don&#8217;t have to pay monthly or go to Kinko&#8217;s for my once or twice a month fax needs.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/19/faxit-nice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Googolopoly</title>
		<link>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/18/googolopoly/</link>
		<comments>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/18/googolopoly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[googolopoly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jotspot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamhowell.org/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

JotSpot is down in the bottom left between Writely and Blogspot. It&#8217;d be Vermont Ave. in the regular game. Box.net obviously meant it as a critique of Google&#8217;s &#8220;web monopoly,&#8221; but I just like it for nostalgic reasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://adamhowell.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/googolopoly_big.gif"><img src="http://adamhowell.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/googolopoly.gif" alt="" title="googolopoly" width="450" height="452" /></a></p>

<p>JotSpot is down in the bottom left between Writely and Blogspot. It&#8217;d be Vermont Ave. in the regular game. <a href="http://blog.box.net/?p=136">Box.net</a> obviously meant it as a critique of Google&#8217;s &#8220;web monopoly,&#8221; but I just like it for nostalgic reasons.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamhowell.org/2008/04/18/googolopoly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.353 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
